Eli Barzilay <eli@...> writes: > The thing is that keeping things completely backward compatible means > keeping some C code (the fit thing), and that translates to a real > problem with linux distributions (see the Fedora point earlier). Not > being completely backward compatible has the advantage of moving at > least the Fedora distribution faster (and I won't be surprised if > Debian/Ubuntu would have issues with this too -- I'm surprised they > didn't say anything about it so far).
I did -- http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=10756. :) You convinced me that the status quo was good enough for now and that it'd eventually be replaced by scheme^Wracket. Glad to see that's happening. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <james...@debian.org> _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
