The whole point of starting the branch early is that it should *not* be a factor in the decision whether something gets in or not.
Two hours ago, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > Yes to both. I plan to create the branch this evening. > > Ryan > > > On 10/07/2011 02:11 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > > I guess so, since the branch hasn't been created yet (but it is > > supposed to be created today, if we're on schedule). > > > > Robby > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:04 PM, John Clements<cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 7, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > >> > >>> I've just now pushed a change for this. > >> > >> Awesome! Can't wait. Will this be a part of 5.2? > >> > >> John > >> > >> > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
