Are you saying this should not go in? Robby
On Friday, October 7, 2011, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > The whole point of starting the branch early is that it should *not* > be a factor in the decision whether something gets in or not. > > > Two hours ago, Ryan Culpepper wrote: >> Yes to both. I plan to create the branch this evening. >> >> Ryan >> >> >> On 10/07/2011 02:11 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> > I guess so, since the branch hasn't been created yet (but it is >> > supposed to be created today, if we're on schedule). >> > >> > Robby >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:04 PM, John Clements<cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Oct 7, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >> >> >>> I've just now pushed a change for this. >> >> >> >> Awesome! Can't wait. Will this be a part of 5.2? >> >> >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> > _________________________________________________ >> > For list-related administrative tasks: >> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
