On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote: > And if it isn't clear, since it is looking at foo's static binding, > your macro is only binding the values from define-struct, not the > syntaxes.
Jay, can you elaborate? What is doing the looking -- the match struct clause? What does it mean to "look at foo's static binding"? I understand that my macro is binding only the values, not the original syntaxes (other than "foo" itself, which is carried through from the user's source). The name "struct:foo" here is completely synthetic because it's being introduced by build-struct-names. Is that what you're referring to? In that case, does writing such a macro require an explicit breaking of hygiene? Shriram _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
