On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <[email protected]> wrote: > Wait, now I realize I misunderstood Sam's proposal. Doesn't this just > make all structs into lists? Like back to the bad old days of 1995?
No, that was just an example of how to define the `make-foo', `foo-x', etc functions. More sensible definitions should work too. The runtime meaning of the functions should be irrelevant. -- sam th [email protected] _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
