On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <s...@cs.brown.edu> 
wrote:
> Wait, now I realize I misunderstood Sam's proposal.  Doesn't this just
> make all structs into lists?  Like back to the bad old days of 1995?

No, that was just an example of how to define the `make-foo', `foo-x',
etc functions. More sensible definitions should work too. The runtime
meaning of the functions should be irrelevant.
-- 
sam th
sa...@ccs.neu.edu

_________________________________________________
  For list-related administrative tasks:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to