A few minutes ago, Laurent wrote:
> Then instead of #f one idea is to go one step further and consider
> different useful cases based on input symbols like 'whitespaces,
> 'non-alpha, etc. ? Or even a list of string/symbols that can be used
> as a splitter.  That would make a more powerful function for
> sure. (It's just that I'm troubled by the uniqueness of this magical
> default argument)

(This is something that I do object to...  It leads to srfi-14 which
is one overkill way for that, and we already have regexps that do
that.  So I think that "simple" is a major point.)

          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
  Racket Developers list:

Reply via email to