On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu > wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > > > > 10 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: > >> It is the future visualizer so I thought it belonged with the > >> visualizer. No? > > > > (You mean "... belonged with the futures", right?) > > Right. :) > > >> Alternative suggestions welcome. > > > > I think that it fits well with other meta-analysis kind of tools like > > errortrace and the profiler, so a new toplevel collection seems to > > make perfect sense. I don't have a concrete suggestion better than > > "future-visualizer" though since I don't know what it does exactly. > > Maybe "future-debugger" or "future-tracker" or something like that? > > I think we have too many top-level collections and making a new one, > especially with "future-" in the name seems like a step in the wrong > direction. > > ("visualizer" is a better word than "debugger" or "tracker" for what > it does, IMO, altho it has elements of those. But if you read the docs > in the Guide about it, you should get some idea what it does.) > Agreed, "debugger" and "tracker" don't really adequately describe it. Maybe "future-profiler" is another option, but maybe confusing since we already have "profiler". (But I still think "visualizer" is best, IMHO). > > Robby >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev