Better than "tools", IMO. How about "perf"? Ie, perf/future-visualizer and perf/optimization-coach/ ?
Robby On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > (Performance) tuning? > > Vincent > > > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500, > Robby Findler wrote: >> >> tools seems like too generic of a word. Is there something like >> "performance-debugging" that isn't so long? >> >> Robby >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> >> wrote: >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:33:02 -0400, >> > Eli Barzilay wrote: >> >> Or maybe add a new "tools" collection for other similar things? >> > >> > I'm about to push the new version of Optimization Coach (formerly >> > Performance Report). Since it now works with any language (not just TR), >> > it would make sense to move it outside of the `typed-racket' collect. >> > It would be a good candidate for the `tools' collection. >> > >> > Vincent _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
