On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > At Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:17:22 -0400, > as...@racket-lang.org wrote: >> 3582b57 Asumu Takikawa <as...@racket-lang.org> 2012-07-20 15:10 >> : >> | Move mzlib/defmacro => racket/defmacro > > I'm not sure this belongs in `racket'. This is not a Racket feature. > It's closer to a CL compatibility library. > > How about having a `compatibility' collect, which would include this and > things like `racket/package' (compatibility with Chez) and `racket/mpair' > (compatibility with Scheme)? It would be harder to confuse these things > with blessed Racket features. > > Vincent
+1 For backwards (ahem) compatibility, we would have to maintain the racket/package and racket/mpair names as aliases, but changing existing uses of them to the new name and making the racket/ documentation point to compatibility/ would help make the point. --Carl _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
