At Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:00:12 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > Having said that, I would like to propose that we COPY > files/subcollections from racket/ to compatibility/ (and keep them in > sync) if we wish to indicate that they are not really rackety.
Assuming you mean keeping the same interface re-providing bindings from one to the other, as opposed to duplicating the implementation, then that's what I did. Vincent _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
