#lang racket2 ?
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > It's no committed & pushed. With the bad argument order. > > Just to show how bad it is, it's not just `findf' -- there's many > others, like `partition' which is very similar, yet it takes the > predicate first. > > I'd really like to fix the order of all of these things. Maybe > someone has some idea how to do that? > > > Also, the same holds for dealing with improper lists: I made the *f > functions deal with them in the same way that the non-*f functions do, > which in turn is a srfi-1 legacy. I think that this is also a bad and > unnecessary idea, and it would be best to make them all require > (proper) lists. > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
