An hour ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> #lang racket2 ?
That is much later than I hoped.
(And when it comes, I certainly hope it won't be `racket2'.)
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
>
> It's no committed & pushed. With the bad argument order.
>
> Just to show how bad it is, it's not just `findf' -- there's many
> others, like `partition' which is very similar, yet it takes the
> predicate first.
>
> I'd really like to fix the order of all of these things. Maybe
> someone has some idea how to do that?
>
> Also, the same holds for dealing with improper lists: I made the *f
> functions deal with them in the same way that the non-*f functions do,
> which in turn is a srfi-1 legacy. I think that this is also a bad and
> unnecessary idea, and it would be best to make them all require
> (proper) lists.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
