At Thu, 30 May 2013 09:01:16 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > I also really don't want to have Typed Racket's documentation outside > of Typed Racket's code repository, and I think it would be a mistake > to do that for other parts of Racket. An on-point comment on this > from just yesterday in a different context: > https://twitter.com/domenic/status/339848565838983168 and I think the > same reasons that's true would make splitting repositories for code > and documentation a big mistake.
Just to make sure that everyone is on the same page: different packages do not imply different repositories. When packages are in a single repository, though, things work best if each package has its own subdirectory. I would imagine, for example, that "scribble-lib", "scribble-doc", and "scribble" would all be directories in a single repository (referenced by three packages), for example. It may even make sense to have certain different packages in a single repository whether or not we split "-lib" and "-doc" into packages. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
