As I understand things, we should certainly try to align divisions of responsibility with divisions of code (including tests and docs) among packages.
My initial experiment probably doesn't align them very well, and I'd expect a better alignment to emerge from everyone's efforts to improve some initial cut. At Thu, 30 May 2013 11:02:16 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > Matthew, > > I have seen 'personal responsibility' mentioned only in passing. > > Does existence of package imply any personal responsibilities? > The current organization doesn't seem to say so. > > -- Matthias > > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
