Should I change the docs as well? Or do you want to do that, Jay?
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > That's the plan. Thanks for fixing them. > > Robby > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: >> >> I recently discovered that DrDr runs `raco test` by default on files, >> and has since February. However, the DrDr documentation says that it >> runs `racket -t`. I discovered this because the change caused many of >> the `net` tests to no longer actually run; see >> >> >> http://drdr.racket-lang.org/27042/pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-test/tests/net/url.rkt >> >> which appears to be successful, even though running `racket` on that >> file would have shown the error that I fixed in >> https://github.com/plt/racket/commit/a4e529a816 . These tests are a >> particularly bad case because they run all their tests in the `main` >> submodule, and thus are *not* executed by `raco test`. If the plan is >> for everything to run with `raco test`, I'll fix these tests. But >> what is the plan? >> >> Sam >> _________________________ >> Racket Developers list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
