I would say that if you know where to change, please go ahead. Robby
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu>wrote: > Should I change the docs as well? Or do you want to do that, Jay? > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > That's the plan. Thanks for fixing them. > > > > Robby > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> > > wrote: > >> > >> I recently discovered that DrDr runs `raco test` by default on files, > >> and has since February. However, the DrDr documentation says that it > >> runs `racket -t`. I discovered this because the change caused many of > >> the `net` tests to no longer actually run; see > >> > >> > >> > http://drdr.racket-lang.org/27042/pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-test/tests/net/url.rkt > >> > >> which appears to be successful, even though running `racket` on that > >> file would have shown the error that I fixed in > >> https://github.com/plt/racket/commit/a4e529a816 . These tests are a > >> particularly bad case because they run all their tests in the `main` > >> submodule, and thus are *not* executed by `raco test`. If the plan is > >> for everything to run with `raco test`, I'll fix these tests. But > >> what is the plan? > >> > >> Sam > >> _________________________ > >> Racket Developers list: > >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > > > >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
