I moved all of distributed places to a new package, which required the one change below. I'm not sure about whether this is a good idea, particularly because neither the `#:at` or `#:named` arguments to `dynamic-place` are mentioned at all in the documentation. Thoughts?
Sam On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:25 PM, <sa...@racket-lang.org> wrote: > > racket/lib/collects/racket/place.rkt > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > --- OLD/racket/lib/collects/racket/place.rkt > +++ NEW/racket/lib/collects/racket/place.rkt > @@ -81,7 +81,11 @@ > (define (dynamic-place module-path function #:at [node #f] #:named [named > #f]) > (cond > [node > - (supervise-place-at node module-path function #:named named)] > + (unless (collection-file-path "distributed.rkt" "racket" "place" > + #:fail (lambda (x) #f)) > + (raise-arguments-error "dynamic-place" > + "distributed places are not available")) > + (supervise-place-at node module-path function #:named named)] > [else > (start-place 'dynamic-place module-path function > #f (current-output-port) (current-error-port))])) _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
