At Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:45:47 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > > With this change, does `raco exe' still work? I think `lazy-require' > > expands in a way that would require the `racket/place/distributed' > > module to be present when creating an executable that uses > > `racket/place'. > > What's the right way to test this?
Try `raco exe' on #lang racket/base (require racket/place) in an installation without distributed places. > > Probably the right approach is to have a `#:node' argument effectively > > carry `supervise-place-at' with it, so that `lazy-require' is not > > needed. > > I don't understand how it would "carry `s-p-a` with it". What do you mean? It looks like a valid `node' value is an object, and so the object could have a method that is called instead of passing the object to `supervise-place-at'. _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
