I'm seeing that in a fresh build. (Didn't see it before, because I had mangled my build.)
I'll push a repair shortly. At Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:14:49 -0400, Stephen Chang wrote: > When compiling a fresh git head clone, I still get some cross-phase > persistence errors (see below). Is this my fault, or are some packages > still missing the declaration? > > > raco setup: --- checking package dependencies --- > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for > <pkgs>/errortrace-doc/errortrace/scribblings > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace/lang > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/algol60 > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drscheme > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drracket > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drracket/private > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribble/tools > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/tools > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/tools > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/tools > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/drracket > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drracket/private > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/drracket > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > raco setup: > raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drracket/private > raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > > As of v5.90.0.2 (pending), to declare a cross-phase persistent module, > > the module body must include > > > > (#%declare #:cross-phase-persistent) > > > > If the module declaration fails to meet the syntactic and import > > constraints of a cross-phase persistent module, then a syntax error is > > reported. > > > > This change is backward-incompatible in two ways: > > > > * Module declarations that are intended as cross-phase persistent > > won't be, anymore, until a `#%declare' form is added. > > > > I think cross-phase persistence is new enough --- and the old, quiet > > inference of persistence is sufficiently distressing --- that this > > won't be much of an issue. > > > > * The grammar of fully-expanded modules now includes `#%declare' > > forms. > > > > Programs that process fully-expanded modules are not common, but I > > expect that they exist outside of the main distribution. Those > > programs will need to be updated. Meanwhile, they won't break until > > they see a module that has a `#%declare' form, which won't happen > > often (at least for the near future). > > > > Although `#:cross-phase-persistent' is the only keyword recognized by > > `#%declare' initially, we'll add more. One possibility is a declaration > > that corresponds to `compile-enforce-module-constants'. > > > > I named the form `#%declare' instead of `declare' to avoid conflicts, > > and also because I expect the form to be used more often in macro > > expansions than directly, so it seems like a "#%" kind of form. > > > > _________________________ > > Racket Developers list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
