The build completes successfully now. Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > I'm seeing that in a fresh build. (Didn't see it before, because I had > mangled my build.) > > I'll push a repair shortly. > > At Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:14:49 -0400, Stephen Chang wrote: >> When compiling a fresh git head clone, I still get some cross-phase >> persistence errors (see below). Is this my fault, or are some packages >> still missing the declaration? >> >> >> raco setup: --- checking package dependencies --- >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for >> <pkgs>/errortrace-doc/errortrace/scribblings >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/errortrace-lib/errortrace/lang >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/algol60 >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drscheme >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drracket >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drracket/private >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribble/tools >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/tools >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/tools >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/tools >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/drracket >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drracket/private >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/scribblings/drracket >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> raco setup: >> raco setup: error: during making for <pkgs>/drracket/drracket/private >> raco setup: module: does not satisfy cross-phase persistent grammar >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> > As of v5.90.0.2 (pending), to declare a cross-phase persistent module, >> > the module body must include >> > >> > (#%declare #:cross-phase-persistent) >> > >> > If the module declaration fails to meet the syntactic and import >> > constraints of a cross-phase persistent module, then a syntax error is >> > reported. >> > >> > This change is backward-incompatible in two ways: >> > >> > * Module declarations that are intended as cross-phase persistent >> > won't be, anymore, until a `#%declare' form is added. >> > >> > I think cross-phase persistence is new enough --- and the old, quiet >> > inference of persistence is sufficiently distressing --- that this >> > won't be much of an issue. >> > >> > * The grammar of fully-expanded modules now includes `#%declare' >> > forms. >> > >> > Programs that process fully-expanded modules are not common, but I >> > expect that they exist outside of the main distribution. Those >> > programs will need to be updated. Meanwhile, they won't break until >> > they see a module that has a `#%declare' form, which won't happen >> > often (at least for the near future). >> > >> > Although `#:cross-phase-persistent' is the only keyword recognized by >> > `#%declare' initially, we'll add more. One possibility is a declaration >> > that corresponds to `compile-enforce-module-constants'. >> > >> > I named the form `#%declare' instead of `declare' to avoid conflicts, >> > and also because I expect the form to be used more often in macro >> > expansions than directly, so it seems like a "#%" kind of form. >> > >> > _________________________ >> > Racket Developers list: >> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
