Argh, sorry, I read the docs for the wrong one, sorry for the misleading response.
Carl Eastlund -- WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes. On Sep 9, 2013 12:16 PM, "J. Ian Johnson" <i...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > I changed it to (call-with-limits (* 30 60) 2048 (lambda () > <run-analysis>)) for a sanity check, which I thought with-limits was just a > macro for. Same problem. The execution takes at least 20 seconds to get to > 15GiB, so it can't be just that GC isn't running in order for the custodian > to notice the usage over the limit. > -Ian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carl Eastlund" <carl.eastl...@gmail.com> > To: "J. Ian Johnson" <i...@ccs.neu.edu> > Cc: "dev" <dev@racket-lang.org> > Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 12:05:21 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: Re: [racket-dev] call-with-limits memory bound isn't actually > bounding memory usage > > > > Does <run-analysis> have the form (lambda () <actually-run-analysis>)? > Because if not, that's the problem. > > Carl Eastlund > > -- > WARNING! Poorly-typed cell phone email precedes. > On Sep 9, 2013 11:55 AM, "J. Ian Johnson" < i...@ccs.neu.edu > wrote: > > > I'm running my analysis benchmarks in the context of (with-limits (* 30 > 60) 2048 <run-analysis>), and it's been good at killing the process when > the run should time out, but now I have an instantiation of the framework > that just gobbles up 15GiB of memory without getting killed. What might be > going on here? > > Running 5.90.0.9 > -Ian > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
