On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Asumu Takikawa <as...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that if you don't specify any dependencies for a package, then > `raco` will warn you about that. However, the exit code is 0 and it's > not an "error". > > Comparatively, if you supply a dependencies field of `empty`, then you > will get a bunch of errors about undeclared dependencies and the exit > code is 1. > > Is there a reason why these two cases are treated differently?
In the first case, you are forgetting to do it and we warn to tell you what you should put. In the second case, you put them in but are wrong and should be CAUGHT and PUNISHED. I think that's the logic behind it. Jay > > Cheers, > Asumu > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev -- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
