On 2013-10-03 06:45:12 -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote: > In the first case, you are forgetting to do it and we warn to tell you > what you should put. In the second case, you put them in but are wrong > and should be CAUGHT and PUNISHED. I think that's the logic behind it.
That seems fair, but then in the first case, should `raco setup` tell you which dependencies are missing? It currently just says there are none (but not which are missing). Cheers, Asumu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
