Just now, Robby Findler wrote:
> Yes, I think that was the point of the original message: to figure out what
> consistent thing we think it should be.
My point was in the "depending on what *I* generally want". I'm
saying that it much better to leave it consistent per some user
choice, since there are different types of users; in contrast to
finding some global default that would work for everyone. (Since I
believe there isn't such a default.)
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
>
> It would be nice if it implied some consistent default, depending on
> what I generally want. Ie, I can be someone who just want the minimum
> -libs, or someone who always wants everything including the -tests.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
