On 10/15/2013 06:40 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Actually, on second thought, I think I'm going to buck the trend here
and answer "yes" to the question in the subject line.

Two scenarios come to mind: someone hears about some cool new library
and then does something like 'raco pkg install math'. Next thing,
something goes wrong and they ask about it on a mailing list and get the
response "Run this code: (require ...)" which ends up running something
from the test suite of that library [1]. In that case, we'd probably
like them to have everything related to the library.

Second: someone decides to build a library that depends on the, say, the
math library and they have to choose what to put in their info.rkt file.
They don't want to put math no matter if it includes the tests or not,
since they don't to force their clients to install the docs. So they'll
put math-lib.

In other words, I don't see a lot of value in a pkg name taken up for
the lib+docs subset of some (conceptual) pile of code, but I do see
value in the "everything" pile and the "non-docs non-tests" pile. So I'd
say that the name "X" (from the subject) should mean everything.

... at least for a library. For an app, I'm less clear.

Robby


[1] this actually happened recently as you probably recall (altho
'test-floating-point' may not be in the math-test pkg)

http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2013-October/059881.html

Right. It's in "math-lib" (the `math/utils' module) because it's useful outside of automated testing. Users can run it to find out how reliable and repeatable their floating-point results are on a given system.

The rest of the math library tests are more or less system-agnostic. (There's a custodian shutdown test for unloading `math/bigfloat' that I think may be good to test on multiple platforms, but that's more of an automation thing.) I can't imagine asking a user to run them, and if I did, I wouldn't mind asking them to install an extra package first.

Are there any other circumstances, besides a package owner asking, that a user would want to run all the tests for a package?

Neil ⊥

_________________________
 Racket Developers list:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Reply via email to