On 2013-11-04 11:49:44 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: > collection-path is legacy and should generally be removed when you find it > (I think I fixed two uses of it Saturday in fact). > But hopefully you could use collection-file-path in most cases instead of > a collections-path function.
There are still some cases where you may want a `collection-paths` function instead though. For example, it would be useful for `raco-find-collection` so that when a user asks for `typed-racket`, it can pick a better default than the alphabetic ordering. (right now you have to ask for `typed-racket/core` to disambiguate, which corresponds to using `collection-file-path`) For my purposes, I could just copy+paste the code in the compiler-lib, but maybe it should be moved into the core? Cheers, Asumu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
