At Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:49:44 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: > collection-path is legacy and should generally be removed when you find it > (I think I fixed two uses of it Saturday in fact).
The documentation does mention that `collection-file-path' is usually preferred, but it doesn't make it clear that `collection-path' is legacy. I'll think of a stronger wording. > But hopefully you could use collection-file-path in most cases instead of a > collections-path function. I pushed a fix for the macro stepper, using `collections-file-path'. Vincent _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
