On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The changes mostly mimic the types and test cases for flonums and flvectors, > but with adjustments to leave extflonums out of the numeric tower. > Everything passes and extflonum expressions seem to type correctly, but I > can't be sure I didn't miss anything. Can a more TR-internals-savvy person > give the changes a quick once-over?
I'll have a look at this. In general we (the TR developers) prefer to review significant changes to TR beforehand, via GitHub pull requests. So that would be a good thing to do in the future. Sam _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
