Why doesn't flatten-begin already do this? Robby
On Friday, July 18, 2014, Asumu Takikawa <as...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering what people think about a potential API addition to the > `syntax/flatten-begin` library. > > Something like `flatten-begin*` (or a less terrible name) that would > recursively flatten `begin` expressions like the `flatten` function does > for plain lists. > > i.e., > (flatten-begin* #'(begin (begin 1 2) 3 4)) => (list #'1 #'2 #'3 #'4) > > as opposed to > (flatten-begin #'(begin (begin 1 2) 3 4)) => (list #'(begin 1 2) #'3 > #'4) > > Would that be useful? I keep finding myself writing functions like this. > > Cheers, > Asumu > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev >
_________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
