On 2014-07-19 23:12:51 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > This sounds like a nice solution and it would be fine for my use-case > too. Anyone have any reasons against? (otherwise I can make the change)
I just realized that `flatten-begin` actually doesn't care if the form starts with a `begin`. In other words, the following evalutes like this: (flatten-begin #'(a 1 2)) => (list #'2 #'3) In which case the behavior of #:all? becomes a bit weird since it would care about the head being a `begin` (otherwise it would collapse too manay things). Maybe the recursive flattener should be a different function after all? Cheers, Asumu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
