Any update on this? If there’s anything that still needs to be changed, let me
know—otherwise, I’ll patiently wait for the process to run its course. Just
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 10:15, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, that makes sense, fixed.
>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 05:37, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>> One comment. The contract combinators are curried so that you can do
>> work on the partial applications. So don't write this:
>> (define ((((ho-val-first-projection
>> impersonate/chaperone-async-channel) ctc) blame) val)
>> instead try to do some work earlier, when you first can. (The most
>> important thing is to minimize the work done after you get the 'val'
Racket Developers list: