Any update on this? If there’s anything that still needs to be changed, let me know—otherwise, I’ll patiently wait for the process to run its course. Just checking in.
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 10:15, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ah, that makes sense, fixed. > >> On Jan 16, 2015, at 05:37, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: >> >> One comment. The contract combinators are curried so that you can do >> work on the partial applications. So don't write this: >> >> (define ((((ho-val-first-projection >> impersonate/chaperone-async-channel) ctc) blame) val) >> >> instead try to do some work earlier, when you first can. (The most >> important thing is to minimize the work done after you get the 'val' >> argument.) >> >> Robby > _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
