This seemed okay, but just a quick read of the code. But did I miss the test cases? (I just followed the link upthread -- sorry if I need to look somewhere else too.)
Robby On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any update on this? If there’s anything that still needs to be changed, let > me know—otherwise, I’ll patiently wait for the process to run its course. > Just checking in. > >> On Jan 16, 2015, at 10:15, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ah, that makes sense, fixed. >> >>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 05:37, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> >>> wrote: >>> >>> One comment. The contract combinators are curried so that you can do >>> work on the partial applications. So don't write this: >>> >>> (define ((((ho-val-first-projection >>> impersonate/chaperone-async-channel) ctc) blame) val) >>> >>> instead try to do some work earlier, when you first can. (The most >>> important thing is to minimize the work done after you get the 'val' >>> argument.) >>> >>> Robby >> > > > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
