On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Robby Findler
<ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> I don't think the libraries are sufficient as is, but I would resist
> adding aliases.
> Perhaps a better way to get people coming from Haskell would be to
> write an essay specifically aimed there?
>   - Step 1: use variables.
>   - Step 2: here are `for` loops!

Instead of an essay, this could be a guide for Haskellers/MLers/
Whatever-ers, which would make it easy to get results into documentation
searches, and that would make it easy to address issues that cannot be
resolved with a new binding like the bad argument order in `take` or the
different input function for the folds.

(Another point for avoiding a `zip` binding is that it's much more
likely to collide with user defined functions than it is in other

          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to racket-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to