-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59143/#review174471
-----------------------------------------------------------



Please make sure there are spaces before open curly brackets, e.g. "if 
(aPassword.contains(",")){" and "}else{". 

The default values are defined both in 
"security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java" and 
"agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/PasswordUtils.java". 
Why not just have them in agents-common and refer to them in the admin module?

- Colm O hEigeartaigh


On May 10, 2017, 1:44 p.m., bhavik patel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59143/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 10, 2017, 1:44 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Ankita Sinha, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan 
> Neethiraj, Mehul Parikh, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, 
> and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-1571
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-1571
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Code Improvement To Follow Best Practices.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/client/HadoopConfigHolder.java
>  29983da 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/PasswordUtils.java 
> f32355a 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/ServiceDBStore.java 
> 33e0e85 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/service/RangerServiceService.java
>  f194b18 
>   security-admin/src/main/resources/conf.dist/ranger-admin-default-site.xml 
> 0feecfe 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59143/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 1. Tested Ranger Admin & Ranger KMS rest calls.
> 2. Verified Test-Connection for plugins on kerberized environment.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> bhavik patel
> 
>

Reply via email to