Apologies, sending the attachment again. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Alok Lal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looks like the attachment didn't come through. > > > > > "There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and > the ones nobody uses" - Bjarne Stroustrup. > > From: Balaji Ganesan <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> > Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> > Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 3:10 AM > To: "[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, " > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: Revising Ranger UI menu > > Hi All, > > There is some thought to streamline the UI given that we are adding a > permissions screen and KMS support. The menu is getting crowded. > > The idea is to change top level menu and introduce sub menu. Here is what > the menu structure could look like > > > Access Manager (change the name from policy manager) > > sub-menu: Resource Based Policies (default) > > sub-menu: Reports (moved from top-level) > > > Auditing (stays the same as before) > > > Settings (new top menu item) > > sub-menu: Users/Groups > > sub-menu: Permissions > > > Encryption > > sub-menu: Encryption policies > > sub-menu: KMS > > > Attaching a mock that team has built in. Let me know if anyone has any > inputs on this change and whether it makes sense. >
