Balaji, I don¹t think you can have attachments in Apache mails. You can you upload it to our wiki to other public URL.
Thanks Bosco From: Balaji Ganesan <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 11:22 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Revising Ranger UI menu > Apologies, sending the attachment again. > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Alok Lal <[email protected]> wrote: >> Looks like the attachment didn't come through. >> >> >> >> >> "There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and >> the ones nobody uses" - Bjarne Stroustrup. >> >> From: Balaji Ganesan >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Reply-To: >> "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 3:10 AM >> To: >> "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, >> "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Subject: Revising Ranger UI menu >> >> Hi All, >> >> There is some thought to streamline the UI given that we are adding a >> permissions screen and KMS support. The menu is getting crowded. >> >> The idea is to change top level menu and introduce sub menu. Here is what the >> menu structure could look like >> >> >> Access Manager (change the name from policy manager) >> >> sub-menu: Resource Based Policies (default) >> >> sub-menu: Reports (moved from top-level) >> >> >> Auditing (stays the same as before) >> >> >> Settings (new top menu item) >> >> sub-menu: Users/Groups >> >> sub-menu: Permissions >> >> >> Encryption >> >> sub-menu: Encryption policies >> >> sub-menu: KMS >> >> >> Attaching a mock that team has built in. Let me know if anyone has any inputs >> on this change and whether it makes sense. >
