Reviewed the Jiras fixed in 0.5, after RANGER-525.
Some of the fixes that have gone in after RANGER-525 look important.

E.g
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-530

Access-type "all" should imply rest of the permissions in Hive


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-531

Legacy plugins unable to download policies


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-532

Storm Plugin Installation failed with error NoClassDefFoundError


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-533

Hbase plugin: if user does not have family-level access to any family in a
table then user may be incorrectly denied access done at table/family
level during get or scan (patch available)


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-534

Upgrade does not migrate some policies


Would it be appropriate to have another release candidate?
Thanks
Dilli

On 6/5/15 10:28 PM, "Ramesh Mani" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>+1
>
>Thanks,
>Ramesh
>
>On 6/3/15, 3:46 AM, "Selvamohan Neethiraj" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>All:
>>
>>As another blocker bug
>>(RANGER-525<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-525>) was fixed
>>today, I have included recent fixes for the Ranger Release 0.5.0
>>(incubating) - Release Candidate # 3:
>>
>>The ranger-0.5.0-rc3 release candidate is build from ranger-0.5 branch
>>and is available with the following artifacts up for a project vote:
>>
>>Git tag for the release:
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ranger.git;a=shortlog
>>;
>>h=refs/tags/ranger-0.5.0-rc3
>>
>>Source release:
>>http://people.apache.org/~sneethir/ranger/ranger-0.5.0-rc3/ranger-0.5.0.t
>>a
>>r.gz
>>
>>PGP Signature:
>>http://people.apache.org/~sneethir/ranger/ranger-0.5.0-rc3/ranger-0.5.0.t
>>a
>>r.gz.asc
>>
>>
>>MD5/SHA hash:
>>
>>http://people.apache.org/~sneethir/ranger/ranger-0.5.0-rc3/ranger-0.5.0.t
>>a
>>r.gz.mds
>>
>>
>>Keys to verify the signature of the release artifact are available at:
>>https://people.apache.org/keys/group/ranger.asc
>>
>>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
>>votes is reached.
>> [   ] +1  approve
>> [   ] +0  no opinion
>> [   ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>Here is my +1 (binding)
>>
>>Thanks
>>Selva-
>
>

Reply via email to