+0
Considering the known problems which have been subsequently fixed but not
in this release candidate
Dilli

On 6/5/15 11:34 PM, "Gautam Borad" <[email protected]> wrote:

>+1
>
>On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Dilli Arumugam
><[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Selva,
>> Just wanted to bring them to attention.
>> I leave the decision to your judgment as release manager.
>> Thanks
>> Dilli
>>
>> On 6/5/15 10:43 PM, "Selvamohan Neethiraj" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >Dilli:
>> >
>> >I understand that some of these fixes needs to be covered in the
>>release.
>> >Can we add them in 0.5.1 release (soon after 0.5.0) ?
>> >
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Selva-
>> >
>> >From:  Dilli Arumugam <[email protected]>
>> >Reply-To:  "[email protected]"
>> ><[email protected]>
>> >Date:  Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 1:38 AM
>> >To:  "[email protected]"
>><[email protected]>
>> >Subject:  Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.0 (incubating) - release
>> >candidate 3 (dev group vote)
>> >
>> >Reviewed the Jiras fixed in 0.5, after RANGER-525.
>> >Some of the fixes that have gone in after RANGER-525 look important.
>> >
>> >E.g
>> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-530
>> >
>> >Access-type "all" should imply rest of the permissions in Hive
>> >
>> >
>> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-531
>> >
>> >Legacy plugins unable to download policies
>> >
>> >
>> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-532
>> >
>> >Storm Plugin Installation failed with error NoClassDefFoundError
>> >
>> >
>> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-533
>> >
>> >Hbase plugin: if user does not have family-level access to any family
>>in a
>> >table then user may be incorrectly denied access done at table/family
>> >level during get or scan (patch available)
>> >
>> >
>> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-534
>> >
>> >Upgrade does not migrate some policies
>> >
>> >
>> >Would it be appropriate to have another release candidate?
>> >Thanks
>> >Dilli
>> >
>> >On 6/5/15 10:28 PM, "Ramesh Mani" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Ramesh
>> >>
>> >> On 6/3/15, 3:46 AM, "Selvamohan Neethiraj"
>><[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> All:
>> >>>
>> >>> As another blocker bug
>> >>> (RANGER-525<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-525>) was
>> >>>fixed
>> >>> today, I have included recent fixes for the Ranger Release 0.5.0
>> >>> (incubating) - Release Candidate # 3:
>> >>>
>> >>> The ranger-0.5.0-rc3 release candidate is build from ranger-0.5
>>branch
>> >>> and is available with the following artifacts up for a project vote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Git tag for the release:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ranger.git;a=shortlo
>> >>>g
>> >>> ;
>> >>> h=refs/tags/ranger-0.5.0-rc3
>> >>>
>> >>> Source release:
>> >>>
>> 
>>>>>http://people.apache.org/~sneethir/ranger/ranger-0.5.0-rc3/ranger-0.5.
>>>>>0
>> .
>> >>>t
>> >>> a
>> >>> r.gz
>> >>>
>> >>> PGP Signature:
>> >>>
>> 
>>>>>http://people.apache.org/~sneethir/ranger/ranger-0.5.0-rc3/ranger-0.5.
>>>>>0
>> .
>> >>>t
>> >>> a
>> >>> r.gz.asc
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> MD5/SHA hash:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> 
>>>>>http://people.apache.org/~sneethir/ranger/ranger-0.5.0-rc3/ranger-0.5.
>>>>>0
>> .
>> >>>t
>> >>> a
>> >>> r.gz.mds
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Keys to verify the signature of the release artifact are available
>>at:
>> >>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/ranger.asc
>> >>>
>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary
>>number
>> >>>of
>> >>> votes is reached.
>> >>>  [   ] +1  approve
>> >>>  [   ] +0  no opinion
>> >>>  [   ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>>
>> >>> Here is my +1 (binding)
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> Selva-
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Regards,
>Gautam.

Reply via email to