-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39122/#review102634
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Madhan Neethiraj


On Oct. 14, 2015, 10:27 a.m., Gautam Borad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39122/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 14, 2015, 10:27 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Alok Lal, Don Bosco Durai, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan 
> Neethiraj, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-688
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-688
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> *Current Implementation:*
> 
> x_user_module_perm.userId refers to x_portal_user.id but while 
> assigning/revoking permissions using permission model, UI sends userId of 
> x_user table.
> So this is a bug in current implementation because UI sends x_user.id and 
> server assumes that it's x_portal_user.id and will create permission.
> When IDs of x_user and x_portal_user will not be in sync at that time this 
> may cause a serious issue.
> 
> *Fix provided in patch:*
> 
> UI will always have x_user/s but on server side x_portal_user/s required. So 
> now we can't expect UI to send x_portal_user.id in userPermission object so 
> in patch what we have done is:
> Let UI send x_user.id in userPermission object but on server side it will be 
> mapped to x_portal_user.id and same when UI is reading permissions, let 
> database return x_portal_user.id that will be mapped to x_user.id. 
> Due to this UI remains as it is and also, we don't need to change table 
> structure of x_user_module_perm.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/scripts/setup.sh 9710706ed5147d572dd988eaf7db5e757a8338f2 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/XUserMgr.java 
> b86087773c97770a96ee62fa817b10615be08bab 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/common/UserSessionBase.java 
> 59e55f3e1db02f1fdd2d03dd22183929b1173027 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/db/XXPortalUserDao.java 
> d3467f86aefccca9b0387e382628b95e4466eecd 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/db/XXUserDao.java 
> 088759469608ab45e3ad3341ad2bf6558a30f5d9 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/db/XXUserPermissionDao.java 
> e10dc14fdcb58265467aa02d0a9b9b2aea1040ad 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/patch/PatchPersmissionModel_J10003.java
>  f0aa938dd918124e050ee54a3dcc64e86e3f5236 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/service/XUserPermissionService.java
>  3ff9c8d0ac070032089bcbc9f5c3c33c401b30b3 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/service/XUserPermissionServiceBase.java
>  59c082d2760acc8bd296b29497ab763cbb97c407 
>   security-admin/src/main/resources/META-INF/jpa_named_queries.xml 
> 0370e9abe60582152f6d71ac8e0ed8312e4f2e7f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39122/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested by creating a XPOrtalUser user using curl command and then for a new 
> user, assigned permissions to check if permissions are not messed up.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gautam Borad
> 
>

Reply via email to