+1 (non-binding) -verify signature and checksums: ok - build from source: ok
Question: why Ratis publishes jars to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/2.0.0/rc4/> even if Ratis will be published to maven repo? -Rui On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:29 PM Xiaoyu Yao <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Verified all checksums and signatures. > - Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE. > - Built from source successfully. > - Ran filestore and the arithmetic examples. > > Thanks, > Xiaoyu > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 6:48 AM Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > - Verified all checksums and signatures. > > - Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE. > > - Built from source successfully. > > > > Thanks a lot for rolling the rc! > > Tsz-Wo > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:03 PM Lokesh Jain <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks runzhiwang for working on the release! > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > - Verified checksum > > > - Built from source > > > - Ran arithmetic and filestore examples > > > > > > Regards > > > Lokesh > > > > > > > On 18-Mar-2021, at 3:44 PM, Shashikant Banerjee < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > * checked signatures > > > > * verified checksums > > > > * Compiled Ratis from source > > > > * Ran RaftConfigurationChange tests. > > > > > > > > Thanks @runzhiwang(王杰) <[email protected]> for putting this rc > > > > together. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Shashi > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:18 AM Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > >> > > > >> * Verified PGP signatures for binary and source tarball. > > > >> * Verified checksums for binary and source tarball. > > > >> * Confirmed year 2021 in NOTICE file. > > > >> * Successfully built from source and ran tests. > > > >> * Confirmed fix for RATIS-1147: TestMultiRaftGroup on > > > >> MiniRaftClusterWithNetty is no longer failing. > > > >> * Confirmed presence of fix for RATIS-1332: Ratis server couln't be > > > >> recovered from failed initialization state. > > > >> * Manually tested by running FileStore, Arithmetic, and Counter > > > examples. > > > >> > > > >> Thank you for your diligence on these release candidates, > runzhiwang. > > > >> > > > >> Chris Nauroth > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Elek, Marton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> +1 (binding) > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> * checked the signatures > > > >>> * checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum > -c" > > > >>> compatible) > > > >>> * Compiled Ratis from the source > > > >>> * Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit > > > >>> > > > >>> * Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the > > staged > > > >>> artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335 > > > >>> > > > >>> * Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test. > > Worked > > > >>> well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead > > lock > > > >>> disappeared <3) > > > >>> > > > >>> ozone version > > > >>> > > > >>> Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r > > > >>> ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e > > > >>> Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z > > > >>> Compiled with protoc 2.5.0 > > > >>> From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f > > > >>> With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from > > 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7 > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks for this next rc, > > > >>> Marton > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
