Thank you all for voting on the Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4.

Vote passes with
  7  +1  binding votes
  2  +1  non-binding votes
  0  -1   votes

 +1 votes from
  Elek Marton (binding)
  Shashikant Banerjee (binding)
  Lokesh Jain (binding)
  Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze (binding)
  Xiaoyu Yao (binding)
  Hanisha Koneru (binding)
  Runzhiwang (binding)
  Chris Nauroth (non-binding)
  Rui Wang (non-binding)

Regards
runzhiwang

Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> 于2021年3月23日周二 下午12:09写道:

> Hi runzhiwang,
>
> I checked the vulnerabilities.  Both vulnerabilities are related to Http so
> that Ratis is not affected as mentioned by Marton.  I agree that we can
> continue the release.  Thanks a lot.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:52 AM runzhiwang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > > As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these
> > > vulnerabilities.
> >
> > > I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't need
> > > to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the
> > > artifacts
> >
> > @Tsz-wo What do you think ?
> >
> > Arpit Agarwal <[email protected]> 于2021年3月23日周二 上午5:58写道:
> >
> > > Can we conclude this vote now?
> > >
> > > > On Mar 22, 2021, at 7:38 AM, Elek, Marton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 3/20/21 3:48 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > > >> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1342 , we have
> bumped
> > > Netty
> > > >> version to 4.1.60.Final in ratis-thirdparty due to the Netty
> > > >> vulnerabilities.
> > > >> -
> > > https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-5mcr-gq6c-3hq2
> > > >> -
> > > https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj
> > > >> Should we also have a ratis-thridparty release?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these
> > > vulnerabilities.
> > > >
> > > > I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't
> need
> > > to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the
> > > artifacts...
> > > >
> > > > Marton
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to