William, Some tests in Apache Ozone are failing with recent Ratis 3.0.0 snapshots. The reason is RATIS-1902.
I would also like to get RATIS-1900 and maybe RATIS-872. RATIS-1900 is a simple performance improvement. RATIS-872 is a good idea to reduce the retry cache memory usage. Good to hear that your tests went well! Tsz-Wo On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 3:37 AM Yaolong Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 for the new Ratis 3.0.0 release. > > > Thanks Tsz-Wo for starting the discussion on 3.0.0 release and William for > testing. > Looking forward to the new release. > > > Regards, > - Yaolong > > > > > > At 2023-10-12 18:13:44, "William Song" <[email protected]> wrote: > >The performance regression testing was successful. The 3.0.0 version we > packaged after the commit 68b394a470e4e1e4a36b44bbaeffc6d7d0601b5a > > showed no significant degradation in performance. > > > >Resource management, including CPU, memory, JVM GC, disk, and network, is > also performing well. > > > > > You may also consider doing some compatibility tests (old/new clients > talking to new/old servers) > > > >So far, compatibility testing has yielded positive results as well. > > > > > >Are there any other patches expected to be included in 3.0.0? If not, > I’ll start rolling out the release candidates ;) > > > >William > > > > > > > >> 2023年10月10日 03:19，Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> 写道： > >> > >> Hi William, > >> > >> It is great to hear that the IoTDB is working well with Ratis 3.0! You > may > >> also consider doing some compatibility tests (old/new clients talking to > >> new/old servers), which is expected to work except for Streaming > >> (RATIS-1569). > >> > >>> Also, I’d be happy to take on the release manager role. Please let me > >> know if there are anything I can help with. > >> > >> Sure. Thanks a lot for taking the release manager role! > >> > >> Tsz-Wo >
