Hi, Ratis Community I just added a new parameter in Ratis-1918 to control the node shutdown threshold. Since PR has already been merged, I'd like to include that commit in 3.0.0 if it's convenient.
Thanks ---------------------------- Xinyu Tan On 2023/10/23 21:09:52 Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > Hi William and others, > > It turns out that both RATIS-1900 and RATIS-872 are quite big and > non-trivial. Since they are not incompatible changes, we may include them > in a post Ratis 3.0.0 release (say, 3.0.1). > > Just checked the pull request queue [1]. It seems that only RATIS-1916 > "OrderAsync does not call handReply" needs to get in. The others are > optional. What do you think? > > Tsz-Wo > [1] https://github.com/apache/ratis/pulls > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 9:32 AM Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: > > > William, > > > > Some tests in Apache Ozone are failing with recent Ratis 3.0.0 snapshots. > > The reason is RATIS-1902. > > > > I would also like to get RATIS-1900 and maybe RATIS-872. RATIS-1900 is a > > simple performance improvement. RATIS-872 is a good idea to reduce the > > retry cache memory usage. > > > > Good to hear that your tests went well! > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 3:37 AM Yaolong Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> +1 for the new Ratis 3.0.0 release. > >> > >> > >> Thanks Tsz-Wo for starting the discussion on 3.0.0 release and William > >> for testing. > >> Looking forward to the new release. > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> - Yaolong > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> At 2023-10-12 18:13:44, "William Song" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >The performance regression testing was successful. The 3.0.0 version we > >> packaged after the commit 68b394a470e4e1e4a36b44bbaeffc6d7d0601b5a > >> > showed no significant degradation in performance. > >> > > >> >Resource management, including CPU, memory, JVM GC, disk, and network, > >> is also performing well. > >> > > >> > > You may also consider doing some compatibility tests (old/new clients > >> talking to new/old servers) > >> > > >> >So far, compatibility testing has yielded positive results as well. > >> > > >> > > >> >Are there any other patches expected to be included in 3.0.0? If not, > >> I’ll start rolling out the release candidates ;) > >> > > >> >William > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> 2023年10月10日 03:19，Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> 写道： > >> >> > >> >> Hi William, > >> >> > >> >> It is great to hear that the IoTDB is working well with Ratis 3.0! > >> You may > >> >> also consider doing some compatibility tests (old/new clients talking > >> to > >> >> new/old servers), which is expected to work except for Streaming > >> >> (RATIS-1569). > >> >> > >> >>> Also, I’d be happy to take on the release manager role. Please let me > >> >> know if there are anything I can help with. > >> >> > >> >> Sure. Thanks a lot for taking the release manager role! > >> >> > >> >> Tsz-Wo > >> > > >
