Hi William, I updated the JIRA list and changed it to md format. Please see the attachment.
> ..., shall we update the website after 3.0.0 and declare a new pluggable-observability? ;) Sure, please update the website. Thank you in advance! Tsz-Wo On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 6:10 AM William Song <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for moving artifacts and reviewing the change list! Let me also > include the detailed explanation of RATIS-1677 in the announcement. > Plus, I have noticed that we already had > 3-pluggable-features(transport,statemachine,raftlog), shall we update the > website after 3.0.0 and declare a new pluggable-observability? ;) > > William > > > 2023年11月19日 16:19，Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > Hi William, > > > > Thanks for putting the summary of the change list! > > > > I found that RATIS-1677 (auto format) is missing. Also, we should move > the > > auto-format related JIRAs to the "Incompatible change" section. > > - Before 3.0.0: when the startup option is RECOVER and no existing > > directories are found, it will auto format an empty directory. (The auto > > format may lead to data loss as described in RATIS-1677.) > > - 3.0.0: when the startup option is RECOVER and no existing directories > are > > found, it will NOT auto format except for the single directory case > > (RATIS-1871). As a result, for the multiple storage directory case, a > new > > server won't be able to start with RECOVER. It has to be > > explicitly formatted (i.e. start with FORMAT for the first time.) > > > > Will check the change list in more details. > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 2:10 AM Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Done. Please check > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ratis/3.0.0/ > >> Tsz-Wo > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 7:10 PM William Song <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Tsz-Wo, > >>> > >>> Could you help move the staged artifacts in svn from the dev area to > the > >>> dist area? Thanks in advance! > >>> > >>> William > >>> > >>>> 2023-11-18 10:50，William Song <[email protected]> wrote： > >>>> > >>>> Thanks you all for voting! > >>>> > >>>> Vote is passed with 9 +1 votes (Attila, Tsz-Wo, Siddharth, Kajie, > >>> Nilotpal, Yaolong, Lokesh, Uma and me). > >>>> > >>>> Thanks again for the votes. It’s so exciting to release 3.0.0 with you > >>> all! > >>>> > >>>> Best Regards, > >>>> William Song > >>>> > >>>>> 2023-11-10 16:59，William Song <[email protected]> wrote： > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi community, > >>>>> > >>>>> I’m calling a vote For Apache Ratis Release 3.0.0 rc0. > >>>>> > >>>>> The git tag to be vote upon: > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/ratis/tree/ratis-3.0.0-rc0 > >>>>> > >>>>> The git commit hash: > >>>>> 238e2ec51cd780df6c214e3d0c20ce4de439fced > >>>>> > >>>>> The source and binary tarballs can be found at: > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/3.0.0/rc0 > >>>>> > >>>>> Fingerprint of the GPG key release artifacts are signed with: > >>>>> DCE2 C33D 41C6 2578 969D BAFE 37D6 ECF8 4E78 BC92 > >>>>> > >>>>> My public key to verify signatures can be found in: > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/KEYS > >>>>> > >>>>> Maven artifacts are staged at: > >>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1142 > >>>>> > >>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. > >>>>> Please vote on releasing this ratis-3.0.0-rc0. Thanks in advance. > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 approve > >>>>> [ ] 0 no opinion > >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>>>> > >>>>> Starting with my +1(binding) > >>>>> - Verified checksums, signatures and git hash. > >>>>> - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE. > >>>>> - Compared the files in src tarball with the files at the given git > >>> tag (all matches excpet for ratis-experiments). > >>>>> - Built from source. > >>>>> - Ran regular Ratis CI. [1] > >>>>> - Ran ratis examples successfully. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/ratis/actions/runs/6812884699 > >>> > >>> > >
