Hi, Tsz Wo

Let’s patiently wait for the merge of Ratis 2329 to ensure that the Celeborn 
community can fix this replication stuck issue in the 3.2.1 release. I think it 
can be completed and merged after the National holiday.

Best
-------------
Xinyu Tan

On 2025/10/02 16:46:57 Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> Hi Xinyu,
> 
> I am fine either way.
> 
> RATIS-2329 is missing super.channelInactive(ctx).  If the current code is
> working, it is okay to merge it without adding super.channelInactive(ctx).
> We may add it later if there is a problem.
> 
> Tsz-Wo
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 6:15 AM Xinyu Tan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > As ratis 2332, 2339 and 2337 has been merged, maybe we can start
> > releasing rc2? Or I can wait for the mergement of 2329, it's good to me now~
> >
> > Best
> > ---------------
> > Xinyu Tan
> >
> > On 2025/09/28 14:50:29 Xinyu Tan wrote:
> > > Hi, all
> > >
> > > Thank you all for the reminders. It appears that I did not clean up the
> > previous tag properly, which caused an issue with the tag uploaded for rc1.
> > I will pay attention to this when preparing rc2.
> > >
> > > As for whether the tag should be pushed only before sending out the
> > email, I do need the CI status for the corresponding tag each time I send a
> > voting email. Once an rc needs to be redone, the earlier steps with svn and
> > mvn must be repeated, which is unavoidable. I believe it is reasonable to
> > push the release and tag together, verify that CI passes, and then send the
> > email; if CI fails, we should delete the corresponding branch and tag and
> > redo the process. I have opened a new PR [1] for this.
> > >
> > > In addition, I plan to prioritize merging 2239 and 2238, then cut rc2
> > from the latest commit on master. If 2329 can be updated in time, it can be
> > included as well. I expect to release rc2 before the National Day holiday.
> > Let us review and merge these PRs these days!
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/1293
> > >
> > > Best
> > > ----------------
> > > Xinyu Tan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2025/09/28 07:46:51 Attila Doroszlai wrote:
> > > > Hi Xinyu,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for working on the release.
> > > >
> > > > Please push your local RC branch to the apache/ratis repo.  According
> > > > to the naming convention it should be "release-3.2.1"
> > > > (https://github.com/apache/ratis/branches/all?query=release).  This
> > > > will fix the "commit does not belong to any branch on this repository"
> > > > issue.
> > > >
> > > > The tag (ratis-3.2.1-rc1) should be pushed only before sending out the
> > > > RC vote email, to avoid having to re-create it in case of any CI
> > > > problem (which could be seen in the branch's runs).
> > > >
> > > > Original:
> > > >
> > > > tag ratis-3.2.1-rc1
> > > > Tagger: OneSizeFitQuorum <[email protected]>
> > > > Date:   Sun Sep 7 13:15:16 2025 +0800
> > > > ...
> > > > commit 93632a93a6013dd9946e5297cfba61c39e1f1239 (tag: ratis-3.2.1-rc1)
> > > >
> > > > Current:
> > > >
> > > > tag ratis-3.2.1-rc1
> > > > Tagger: OneSizeFitQuorum <[email protected]>
> > > > Date:   Wed Sep 24 00:04:45 2025 +0800
> > > > ...
> > > > commit 9156998c9be938bc5161368bf83671f72acd47e9 (tag: ratis-3.2.1-rc1)
> > > >
> > > > -Attila
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

Reply via email to