On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Matt Franklin <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thursday, December 20, 2012, Chris Geer wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Chris Geer <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Matt Franklin < > [email protected]<javascript:;> > > >wrote: > > > > > >> On Thursday, December 20, 2012, Chris Geer wrote: > > >> > > >> > Has anyone evaluated the newer releases on shindig? I noticed they > are > > >> on > > >> > 2.5-beta5 and we are still on 2.5-beta3. Any desire to try and > upgrade > > >> for > > >> > the 0.19 release? > > >> > > >> > > >> I thought we were on beta4; but, we should definitely upgrade. > > >> > > > > > > Ok, I'll try and get that change made this week. > > > > > > > I just checked this in. > > > We should also document the process for upgrading to a new version (digging > overridden files, etc). > First draft in place. > > > > We still get a lot of those ehCache sizeOf > > warnings. Any idea if we can tweak something to reduce out object graph > > sizes? I know we can increase the size that is allowed to avoid the > warning > > but I don't understand why we see that at all. Anyone understand how > > Shindig is using ehcache? > > > > I know you can tweak the sizes in shindig.properties. > I was more curious why we were seeing the warnings and if there is something we can do to reduce the number of objects we have in memory. > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > Chris > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
