Adding Stanton, since he made the changes in Shindig. He can probably explain what you are seeing.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Chris Geer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Matt Franklin <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > On Thursday, December 20, 2012, Chris Geer wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Chris Geer <[email protected] > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Matt Franklin < > > [email protected]<javascript:;> > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Thursday, December 20, 2012, Chris Geer wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Has anyone evaluated the newer releases on shindig? I noticed they > > are > > > >> on > > > >> > 2.5-beta5 and we are still on 2.5-beta3. Any desire to try and > > upgrade > > > >> for > > > >> > the 0.19 release? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> I thought we were on beta4; but, we should definitely upgrade. > > > >> > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll try and get that change made this week. > > > > > > > > > > I just checked this in. > > > > > > We should also document the process for upgrading to a new version > (digging > > overridden files, etc). > > > > First draft in place. > > > > > > > > We still get a lot of those ehCache sizeOf > > > warnings. Any idea if we can tweak something to reduce out object graph > > > sizes? I know we can increase the size that is allowed to avoid the > > warning > > > but I don't understand why we see that at all. Anyone understand how > > > Shindig is using ehcache? > > > > > > > I know you can tweak the sizes in shindig.properties. > > > > I was more curious why we were seeing the warnings and if there is > something we can do to reduce the number of objects we have in memory. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > Chris > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
