+1 Also I think we should document the roadmap on what are the enhancements/bug fixes and approximate time frame on when they can be expected. I know this will not be 100% but it can be updated as the plan changes.I think this will help the existing contributors to focus on few things instead of scattering over large set of things. Also this may encourage the new Contributors to easily step in on the enhancements they wish to have.
Thanks & Regards, --Kiran -----Original Message----- From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 3:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Ripple Release +1 Thank you Parashu. As I said before I am here to help as a mentor. Given the status of this podling I believe we will need to go to the IPMC to get the necessary binding votes. Since this is the first formal release from this project it is likely that we will need a very close eye on the details of the legal checklist (certainly the IPMC will be thorough in this regard). After this first release subsequent releases should be much easier. Ross Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation -----Original Message----- From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [DISCUSS] Ripple Release Hi, I wanted to start a discuss thread on making an official release for Ripple. We would be picking up the latest from the master branch, tag it as a release candidate (version 0.9.24) and follow the process as in http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list Will this be something that the community would be interested in ? Please +1, and raise any questions in this [DISCUSS] thread.
