On Wed, Jan 21, 2015, at 22:15, Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > Thanks Christian. > > Kiran, I agree with you about the plan. We should definitely discuss the > future plans. There have also been some discussions on the Cordova > mailing > list about how Ripple could be leverage better, and some prototypes have > been built. We should look at working on the plan separately from this > DISCUSS thread. > > Community, does anyone have opinions on how best to work on a roadmap, > and > do you guys think a roadmap is required?
Speaking as Ripple user, I would be happy if there is a sign of life aka release in general. Roadmap can be created when we have some momentum back > > On 1/21/15, 12:18 PM, "Christian Grobmeier" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >+1 from me also. > > > >I am willing to help in the first review of the release and dig with you > >folks through the release stuff. My knowledge is not perfect, but I am > >absolutely sure the rest of the IPMC will have something to say. > > > >Also I would like to highlight what Ross said: the first release is > >painful, but the second is already pretty smoothly. To keep it like that > >it perfectly makes sense to document the release process as good as we > >can. > > > >Here is some first document to read: > >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > > >Basically these are the most important requirements: > > > > - all code is covered by CLA/ICLA (it is the case now) > > - all code reflects the AL 2.0 headers > > - all dependencies are named with their respective licenses (NOTICE > > file) > > - we have LICENSE file > > - we have signed the release, we provide an md5 (to my knowledge, some > > variations might apply) > > - we provide a KEYS file > > - we release source files first, then optionally binary files > > - we release on our own hardware. Everything else (like NPM) is > > optional > > - we need to vote on the release with +1 or -1. -1 is usually not > > blocking, but we should take it serious (only code -1 is blocking) > > - we must not forgot to notify the IPMC, see IPMC rules > > > >It's all I can think of right now. > > > >Please keep the ball rolling, thanks a lot Parashuram! > > > >Regards, > > > >Christian > > > > > >On Wed, Jan 21, 2015, at 17:08, Venkata Kiran wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> Also I think we should document the roadmap on what are the > >> enhancements/bug > >> fixes and approximate time frame on when they can be expected. I know > >> this > >> will not be 100% but it can be updated as the plan changes.I think this > >> will > >> help the existing contributors to focus on few things instead of > >> scattering > >> over large set of things. Also this may encourage the new Contributors > >>to > >> easily step in on the enhancements they wish to have. > >> > >> Thanks & Regards, > >> --Kiran > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 3:56 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Ripple Release > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Thank you Parashu. As I said before I am here to help as a mentor. Given > >> the > >> status of this podling I believe we will need to go to the IPMC to get > >> the > >> necessary binding votes. > >> > >> Since this is the first formal release from this project it is likely > >> that > >> we will need a very close eye on the details of the legal checklist > >> (certainly the IPMC will be thorough in this regard). After this first > >> release subsequent releases should be much easier. > >> > >> Ross > >> > >> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. > >> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH) [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:18 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: [DISCUSS] Ripple Release > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I wanted to start a discuss thread on making an official release for > >> Ripple. > >> We would be picking up the latest from the master branch, tag it as a > >> release candidate (version 0.9.24) and follow the process as in > >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list > >> > >> Will this be something that the community would be interested in ? > >>Please > >> +1, and raise any questions in this [DISCUSS] thread. > >> >
