In any case, I suggest posting the proposal to the user list and getting
reactions before voting.
Patricia
On 1/18/2012 1:50 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Probably a vote.
Sorry for not mentioning this before, I'm snowed under...again.
I remember last time this came up we elected to keep support for Java 5
because we had a user who was dependent on it because of their use of Real
Time Java. Does anyone remember that or did I make it up? My memory has
never been great, given our small size it might be worth reaching out to
him and seeing if his situation has changed at all.
Just my opinion.
Sent via mobile device, please forgive typos and spacing errors.
On 18 Jan 2012 09:46, "Simon IJskes - QCG"<si...@qcg.nl> wrote:
On 15-01-12 12:52, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 15-01-12 09:55, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
Shall we adapt our compatibility policy?
http://www.oracle.com/**technetwork/java/eol-135779.**html<http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html>
Gr. Sim
+1
Might as well, we don't have the resources at present to support Java 5
Also some of my concurrency work depends on Java 6 library features.
Shall we formulate our supported targets as:
* java se 6 (Ubuntu,Windows,Solaris,OsX)
* openjdk 7 (idem)
* java se 7 (idem)
Gr. Sim
Do we need a vote on this, or shall i implement.
Gr. Sim
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
